The issue of service charges in the Strait of Hormuz is back on the table. According to US media, not only Iran but also Oman has drawn up a plan to demand payments from ships passing through the vital strait.
According to The New York Times, Oman has even already submitted an official proposal to the United States. Washington is strongly opposed to charges for transit through the Strait of Hormuz, as the shipping route was freely accessible before the war and is of vital importance to international trade.
Sources cited by the American newspaper contradict one another regarding the nature of the service charges. According to an Iranian official, the charges would be mandatory for all ships wishing to sail through the Strait of Hormuz. A diplomat from the region, however, states that the Omani proposal is based on voluntary payments.
An American source confirms that the proposal has been received. This suggests that the discussion on service charges is no longer merely an Iranian plan, but is becoming part of broader consultations on the future of the strait. This makes the situation a sensitive one for shipping companies, shippers and freight forwarders.
For international logistics, the Strait of Hormuz is a strategic route. Ships sailing into or out of the Persian Gulf have few alternatives. Additional costs, unclear rules or mandatory coordination with the authorities can have a direct impact on sailing schedules, fuel costs and transport prices. Further information on international sea freight can be found on the sea freight page.
Oman and Iran lie opposite each other on either side of the Strait of Hormuz. Recently, ships have mainly been using the route past Oman, much to Tehran’s displeasure. On Monday, Iran stated its intention to manage the strait jointly with Oman.
Officials from both countries met for the first time in a new Joint Hormuz Commission to discuss the future of the shipping route. According to the parties involved, this commission is tasked with examining safety, transit and possible agreements regarding services in the area.
For the shipping sector, the practical implications are of particular importance. It is not yet clear whether the service charges will apply only to ships sailing along the coast of Oman, or to the entire Strait of Hormuz. It is also unclear who will collect the charges, how much they will amount to, and what services they will cover.
The memorandum of understanding between Iran and the United States previously stated that the Strait of Hormuz would reopen with immediate effect. Furthermore, no payments would be required for the shipping route for at least sixty days.
Iran has since stated that the service charges may come into effect after that period. The United States is protesting against this. Washington regards payments for transit as a threat to freedom of navigation and international trade.
Many Gulf states that depend on oil exports have also spoken out against such charges. Before the war, the route was free of charge. New charges could further increase the economic pressure on the energy trade, tanker shipping and container flows.
For logistics companies, the debate is not just about politics. If service charges become mandatory, or if ships take longer to reach their destination due to additional checks, this could be passed on in transport prices. Shipping lines may pass on extra costs via surcharges, adjusted rates or stricter booking conditions.
Uncertainty also comes at a price. Ships may have to sail more slowly, wait temporarily for clearance or opt for alternative routes. This affects transit times, the availability of equipment and planning at ports. For importers and exporters, this means that up-to-date information remains crucial.
TOP is closely monitoring developments surrounding the Strait of Hormuz, as geopolitical tensions can quickly have an impact on sea freight, air freight and multimodal transport. Read more about multimodal transport, air freight and customs.
The Strait of Hormuz was blocked for months following the outbreak of war between Iran, Israel and the United States. The reopening of the shipping route brought a cautious recovery, but the debate over service costs shows that the uncertainty has not yet disappeared.
For shipping companies, the key question remains whether the route will remain safe, predictable and affordable. For shippers, the main concern is whether goods arrive on time and whether additional costs remain manageable. As long as Iran, Oman, the United States and the Gulf states fail to reach stable agreements, the Strait of Hormuz will remain a vulnerable link in global trade.
Companies transporting goods via the Gulf region would be well advised to take into account possible surcharges, longer transit times and adjusted sailing schedules. Clear agreements on rates, documentation and delivery terms remain essential in this regard. Further information on delivery terms can be found on the Incoterms page.
…the Strait of Hormuz is one of the world’s most important maritime chokepoints? Disruptions in this region can have a direct impact on fuel prices, sea freight, sailing schedules and international supply chains.
Ships are once again permitted to pass through on a limited basis, but monitoring and authorisation remain key.
Read more →A safe reopening of the Strait of Hormuz could lead to increased traffic heading towards Rotterdam.
Read more →New incidents highlight just how vulnerable the shipping lane still is.
Read more →Shipping companies are looking for alternatives when the Strait of Hormuz becomes too uncertain or too expensive.
Read more →